You toss paper 300 times into a bin. You miss the first but nail the second one. Subsequently, your chance of hitting the bin equals your cumulative win rate. What is the probability of hitting the bin exactly 298 times out of 300 throws?
Setting Up the Model
Let’s define:
- Yi — indicator random variable: 1 if the i-th toss is a hit, 0 otherwise
- Xn=∑i=1nYi — total hits after n tosses
- The transition rule: P(Yn=1∣Y1,…,Yn−1)=n−1Xn−1
Initial conditions: Y1=0 (miss), Y2=1 (hit), so X2=1.
Pattern Recognition
Working through small cases makes the structure visible:
| n | Feasible values of Xn | Probability of each |
|---|
| 2 | {1} | 1 |
| 3 | {1,2} | 21 each |
| 4 | {1,2,3} | 31 each |
The pattern suggests: for any n, all n−1 feasible values of Xn are equally likely with probability n−11.
Proof by Induction
Claim: P(Xn=k)=n−11 for k∈{1,2,…,n−1}.
Base case (n=3): P(X3=1)=P(X3=2)=21. ✓
Inductive step: Assume P(Xn−1=j)=n−21 for all feasible j. We show P(Xn=k)=n−11.
Case k=1: The only path is Xn−1=1 and the n-th toss misses.
P(Xn=1)=P(Xn−1=1)⋅n−1n−2=n−21⋅n−1n−2=n−11
Case k>1: Two paths lead here — hit on toss n from Xn−1=k−1, or miss on toss n from Xn−1=k.
P(Xn=k)=P(Xn−1=k−1)⋅n−1k−1+P(Xn−1=k)⋅n−1n−1−k
Substituting the inductive hypothesis P(Xn−1=j)=n−21:
=n−21⋅n−1k−1+n−21⋅n−1n−1−k=n−21⋅n−1(k−1)+(n−1−k)=n−21⋅n−1n−2=n−11
□
Answer
For n=300, all values X300∈{1,2,…,299} are equally likely. Therefore:
P(X300=298)=2991≈0.33%
Video Walkthrough
There’s also a natural extension: what if the miss rate decreases with each miss? The structure of the proof changes but a uniformity result still holds — worked out in the video above.